Terms and conditions

It is considered that every minor who has not acquired full autonomy is capable of legal actions appropriate in nature to the intellectual and free maturity of minors of his age.

(1) If the legal representative has given a minor who has not acquired full autonomy, in accordance with the customs of private life, consent to a certain legal act or to achieve a certain purpose, the minor is able to act legally himself within the limits of the consent, unless this is specifically prohibited by law; consent may subsequently be limited or withdrawn.

(2) If there are more than one legal representative, it is sufficient if at least one of them expresses their will towards the third person. However, if several representatives act together and contradict each other, the speech of any of them will not be taken into account.

(1) If the legal representative of a minor, who has not acquired full autonomy, gives consent to the independent operation of a commercial plant or other similar gainful activity, the minor becomes eligible for actions connected with this activity. The court's permission is required for the consent to be valid.

(2) The permission of the court replaces the condition of a certain age, if it is established for the performance of a certain gainful activity by another legal regulation.

(3) Consent can be revoked by the legal representative only with the permission of the court.

Dependent work of minors under the age of fifteen or minors who have not completed compulsory schooling is prohibited. These minors can only perform artistic, cultural, advertising or sports activities under the conditions set by another legal regulation.

(1) A minor who has reached the age of fifteen and has completed compulsory schooling may undertake to perform dependent work in accordance with another legal regulation.

(2) The legal representative of a minor who has not reached the age of sixteen may terminate his employment relationship or contract for the performance of work establishing a similar obligation between the employee and the employer, if this is necessary in the interest of the education, development or health of the minor, in the manner established by another legal regulation.

A minor who has not acquired full autonomy is never, regardless of the content of other provisions, capable of acting independently in those matters for which even his legal representative would need the permission of the court.

(1) If a minor who is not fully autonomous proposes that the court grant him autonomy, the court will grant the proposal if the minor has reached the age of sixteen, if his ability to support himself and take care of his own affairs is proven, and if the legal representative of the minor agrees to the proposal. In other cases, the court will grant the request if it is in the interest of the minor for serious reasons.

(2) Under the conditions set out in paragraph 1, the court will grant a minor self-determination even on the proposal of his legal representative, if the minor agrees to the proposal.

In anticipation of his own incapacity to act legally, a person may express a will that his affairs be administered in a certain way, or that a certain person administer them, or that a certain person become his guardian.

(1) If the declaration is not in the form of a public document, it must be made by a private document bearing the date and attested by two witnesses; the witness shall provide information about himself in the confirmation by which he can be identified.

(2) Witnesses can only be persons who have no interest in the statement and its content and who are not blind, deaf, mute or ignorant of the language in which the statement is made. Witnesses must sign the statement and be able to confirm the declarant's capacity to act and the content of his statement.

(3) If the content of a declaration made by a public deed determines who is to become the guardian, the person who drew up the public deed shall enter the information about who made the declaration, who is called as guardian and who drew up the public deed in a non-public list kept under another law .

(1) If the statement is made by a blind person or a person who cannot or cannot read or write, the statement must be read aloud to him by a witness who did not write the statement. A blind person, or a person who cannot or cannot read or write, shall certify before witnesses that the document contains his true will.

(2) If the statement is made by a person with a sensory disability who cannot read or write, the content of the document must be interpreted to him in the way of communication he has chosen, by a witness who did not write the statement; all witnesses must master the means of communication by which the content of the document is interpreted. Whoever makes the statement confirms in front of witnesses, using the chosen method of communication, that the document contains his true will.

(1) In order to explicitly revoke a declaration, a declaration of will is required in the form prescribed in § 39, paragraph 1.

(2) If the document containing the declaration is destroyed by the person who made it, it has the effects of revocation.

If the declaration relates to a matter other than the profession of the guardian and if the effectiveness of the declaration is tied to a condition, the court will decide on the fulfillment of the condition.

If the circumstances clearly change in such a substantial way that the person who made the statement would not have made it under such circumstances or would have made it with a different content, the court will change or cancel the statement if the person who made the statement would otherwise be at risk of serious harm. Before issuing a decision, the court will make the necessary efforts to find out the opinion of the person whose statement it is deciding, even using the method of communication that the person chooses.

If the declaration or its revocation is invalid, the court will consider them, if there is no reason to doubt the will of the person who made them.

If a person needs help in making a decision because a mental disorder causes difficulties in this, although he may not be limited in his autonomy, he can arrange the provision of support with the supporter; there may be more supporters.

(1) With the assistance agreement, the supporter commits to the supportee that, with his consent, he will be present at his legal meetings, that he will provide him with the necessary information and communications, and that he will help him with advice.

(2) The contract becomes effective on the day it is approved by the court. If the contract is not concluded in writing, the parties are required to show their will to conclude the contract before the court. The court will not approve the contract if the interests of the supporter conflict with the interests of the supported.

(1) The sponsor may not endanger the interests of the supported by improper influence, nor enrich himself without reason at the expense of the supported.

(2) The supporter proceeds in the fulfillment of his duties in accordance with the decisions of the supported. If the supported person legally acts in writing, the supporter can attach his signature indicating his function, and possibly also information about the support he provided to the supported person; the supporter also has the right to object to the invalidity of the supported legal action.

At the motion of the supported or the supporter, the court shall recall the supporter; the court will revoke it even if the sponsor seriously violates its obligations, even without a motion.

(1) If a mental disorder prevents an adult who has no other representative from acting independently, he or she may be represented by his or her descendant, ancestor, sibling, spouse or partner, or a person who lived with the represented person in a joint household for at least three years before the establishment of representation.

(2) The representative shall inform the represented person that he/she will represent him/her and shall clearly explain to him/her the nature and consequences of the representation. If the person to be represented refuses, the representation does not take place; the ability to express a wish is sufficient for refusal.

Court approval is required to establish representation. Before issuing a decision, the court will make the necessary efforts to find out the opinion of the represented person, even using the method of communication that the represented person chooses.

The representative ensures the protection of the interests of the represented and the fulfillment of his rights and that his way of life does not contradict his abilities and that, if this cannot reasonably be opposed, it corresponds to the special ideas and wishes of the represented.

(1) Representation applies to usual matters, as it corresponds to the living conditions of the represented person. However, the representative is not authorized to grant consent to interfere with the mental or physical integrity of a person with permanent consequences.

(2) The representative can deal with the income of the represented to the extent necessary for the provision of usual affairs, as it corresponds to the living conditions of the represented; however, he can only deal with funds on the account of the represented person to the extent not exceeding the monthly living wage of an individual according to another legal regulation.

If the person is represented by more than one representative, it is sufficient if one of them acts. However, if several representatives act together and contradict each other, the speech of any of them will not be taken into account.

(1) The representation ceases if the representative renounces it or if the represented refuses to be further represented by the representative; the ability to express a wish is sufficient for refusal. The representation also expires if the court appoints a guardian for the represented person.

(2) If a decision-making assistance agreement is concluded, the representation will cease to be effective to the extent that the represented person is legally competent to act.

(1) Limitation of self-rights can only be done in the interest of the person concerned, after seeing him and with full recognition of his rights and his personal uniqueness. In doing so, the extent and degree of a person's inability to take care of their own affairs must be thoroughly taken into account.

(2) A person's autonomy can only be limited if he would otherwise be at risk of serious harm and if milder and less restrictive measures are not sufficient in view of his interests.

(1) Only a court can limit a person's autonomy.

(2) The court will make the necessary efforts to find out the opinion of the person about whose autonomy it is deciding, even using the method of communication that the person chooses.

(1) The court can limit a person's autonomy to the extent that a person is not capable of legal action due to a mental disorder that is not only temporary, and it will define the extent to which the person's ability to legally act independently has been limited.

(2) If a person has difficulties in communicating, this is not in itself a reason to limit autonomy.

The court may entrust a third party with the execution of certain individual legal actions or the management of property during the proceedings on the limitation of jurisdiction, if this is necessary to prevent serious damage.

The court may limit its jurisdiction in connection with a certain matter to the time necessary for its settlement, or to a certain period otherwise determined, but no longer than three years; upon expiry of the period, the legal effects of the restrictions cease. However, if proceedings are initiated during this time to extend the limitation period, the legal effects of the original decision last until a new decision is issued, but no longer than one year.

If the circumstances change, the court will immediately change or cancel its decision, even without a motion.

If the court decides to limit a person's autonomy, the person called by it as a guardian can propose to be appointed as a guardian; if she does not submit the proposal, the court will find out her opinion. If this person is eligible for guardianship, the court appoints him as guardian with his consent.

In a decision on the limitation of autonomy, the court appoints a guardian for a person. When choosing a guardian, the court takes into account the wishes of the ward, his needs and the suggestions of people close to the guardians, if they are looking out for his benefit, and makes sure that the selection of a guardian does not cause the ward's distrust of the guardian.

A guardian may not appoint a person legally incapable of acting or a person whose interests conflict with the interests of the ward, or the operator of a facility where the ward resides or provides services to him or a person dependent on such a facility.

The decision to limit autonomy does not deprive a person of the right to act independently legally in ordinary matters of everyday life.

(1) If the guardian acted independently, even though he could not act without the guardian, his legal actions can only be declared invalid if they cause harm to him. However, if only a change in the scope of the guardian's duties is sufficient to remedy the situation, the court will do so without being bound by the parties' proposals.

(2) If the guardian acted independently, even though he could not act without the guardian, the guardian's actions are considered valid if the guardian approved them. This applies even if such a legal action was approved by the actor himself after he acquired legal rights.

(1) A person's name is his personal name and surname, or his other names and surnames that belong to him according to the law. Every person has the right to use his name in legal relations, as well as the right to protect and respect his name.

(2) A person who uses a name other than his own in legal dealings bears the consequences of mistakes and the resulting damage.

(1) A person who has been affected by the questioning of his right to a name or who has suffered damage due to an unauthorized interference with this right, in particular through the unauthorized use of a name, may demand that the unauthorized interference be waived or that its consequences be removed.

(2) If the person concerned is absent, or if he is missing, incapacitated, or if for some other reason he cannot exercise the right to protect his name himself, his spouse, descendant, ancestor or partner may exercise it, unless the affected person, even if he is incompetent, has expressly made it clear, that he doesn't want it.

(3) If the unauthorized intervention concerns the surname and if the reason for this is an important interest in the protection of the family, the spouse or another person close to the person concerned may claim protection independently, even if their right to the name was not directly affected.

(1) A person can adopt a pseudonym for a certain field of activity or even for private communication. Legal proceedings under a pseudonym are not detrimental to validity if it is clear who acted and the other party cannot have doubts about the person acting.

(2) If a pseudonym becomes known, it enjoys the same protection as a name.

(1) A person is domiciled in a place where he stays with the intention of living there permanently subject to a change in circumstances; such intention may be inferred from his statement or from the circumstances of the case. If a person lists a place other than his actual residence as his residence, anyone can also invoke his actual residence. A person who claims the said place in good faith cannot argue that he has his real residence in another place.

(2) If a person does not have a residence, they are considered to be the place where they live. If such a place cannot be ascertained, or if it can only be ascertained with disproportionate difficulties, the place where the person has property, or the place where he last resided, is considered to be a person's residence.

(1) A person's personality is protected, including all his natural rights. Everyone is obliged to respect a person's free choice to live according to his own will.

(2) In particular, the protections enjoy the life and dignity of a person, his health and the right to live in a favorable environment, his seriousness, honor, privacy and his manifestations of a personal nature.

(1) A person whose personality has been affected has the right to demand that the unauthorized interference be stopped or that its consequences be removed.

(2) After a person's death, any person close to him can claim the protection of his personality.

(1) If the unauthorized interference with a person's personality is related to his activity in a legal entity, this legal entity can also exercise the right to protect his personality; during his lifetime, however, only in his name and with his consent. If a person is unable to express their will due to absence or lack of judgment, consent is not required.

(2) After the death of a person, a legal entity can demand that the unauthorized interference be stopped and that its consequences be removed.

Capturing a person's form in any way so that it is possible to determine his identity based on the image is only possible with his permission.

(1) Expanding the form of a person is possible only with his permission.

(2) If someone consents to the display of their likeness under circumstances from which it is clear that it will be disseminated, it is valid that they also consent to its reproduction and distribution in the usual way, as they could reasonably expect given the circumstances.

No one may invade another's privacy unless they have a legal reason to do so. In particular, it is not possible to violate a person's private spaces, monitor their private life or make an audio or video recording of it, use such or other recordings made of a person's private life by a third party, or disseminate such recordings of their private life without their permission. Private documents of a personal nature are also protected to the same extent.

(1) Anyone who has given permission to use a written document of a personal nature, a likeness or an audio or video recording relating to a person or his expressions of a personal nature, may revoke the permission, even if he has granted it for a certain period of time.

(2) If the permission granted for a certain period of time was revoked without this being justified by a substantial change in circumstances or another reasonable reason, the appellant shall compensate the resulting damage to the person to whom the permission was granted.

(1) Permission is not required if the likeness or audio or visual recording is taken or used to exercise or protect other rights or legally protected interests of others.

(2) Permission is not required even if a likeness, a written document of a personal nature or an audio or video recording is taken or used on the basis of the law for an official purpose or if someone makes a public appearance on a matter of public interest.

An image or audio or visual recording may also be acquired or used in an appropriate manner for scientific or artistic purposes and for press, radio, television or similar news without the person's permission.

A legal reason to invade the privacy of another or to use his or her likeness, personal writing, or audio or video recording may not be used in an unreasonable manner in conflict with a person's legitimate interests.

Man is untouchable.

(1) The human body is under legal protection even after the person's death. Disposing of human remains and human remains in a manner that is unworthy of the deceased is prohibited.

(2) If the human remains are not deposited in a public burial ground, the person who was explicitly designated by the person before his death has the right to release them; otherwise his spouse, child, or parent in turn, and if none of them are present, or if they refuse to receive the remains, his heir will receive them.

A person can be admitted to a health care facility without his consent or kept in it without his consent only for reasons established by law and on the condition that the necessary care for his person cannot be ensured by milder and less restrictive measures. Filing a motion to limit autonomy does not in itself establish a reason for a person to be taken to or held in such a facility without their consent.

(1) If a person is admitted to or detained in a health care facility, the health care provider shall immediately notify his legal representative, guardian, or supporter and his spouse or other known close person; however, he may not make the announcement to his spouse or other close person, if he was forbidden to do so.

(2) The admission of a person to a facility providing health care is notified by the health service provider within 24 hours to the court; this also applies if a person is detained in such a facility. The court will decide on the measure taken within seven days.

(1) The provider of health services shall ensure that a person admitted to a facility providing health care or detained in such a facility receives, without undue delay, an appropriate explanation of his legal status, the legal reason for the measure taken, and the options for legal protection, including the right to choose an attorney or confidant.

(2) The explanation is given in such a way that a person can sufficiently understand it and realize the nature of the action taken and its consequences; if such a person has a legal representative, guardian or supporter, the explanation shall also be given to him without undue delay.

(1) If a person has an agent or trustee, the health service provider shall notify the agent or trustee of the measures taken without undue delay after becoming aware of them.

(2) The fiduciary may exercise all his rights on behalf of the person in his name arising in connection with his admission to the relevant facility or his keeping in such a facility. A supporter has the same rights as a trustee.

Anyone who has been admitted to a health care facility or who is kept in it has the right to discuss their own affairs with their representative, confidant or supporter in a personal interview and without the presence of third parties.

(1) A person admitted to a facility providing health care or held in such a facility has the right to have his medical condition, medical documentation, or statement of the attending physician about the inability to judge and express wishes independently reviewed by a physician independent of the provider of health services in that facility and its operator. A trustee or supporter has the same right.

(2) If the right to review is exercised even before the court makes a decision pursuant to Section 105, paragraph 2, it must be possible to exercise it in such a way that the court can evaluate the results of the review in proceedings on the admissibility of the measure taken.

If the court decides on the admissibility of the measure taken, this approves the forced stay in a facility providing health care, but this does not take away the right to refuse a certain procedure or treatment.

(1) A person who has had a body part taken away has the right to know how it was disposed of. Disposing of the removed part of the human body in a manner that is unworthy of a person or in a manner that endangers public health is prohibited.

(2) The removed part of a person's body can be used for medical, research or scientific purposes during his lifetime, if he has given his consent. The use of a removed part of a person's body for a purpose that is unusual in nature always requires his express consent.

(3) The same applies to what originates in the human body as to the parts of the human body.

A person can leave a part of his body to another person only under the conditions established by another legal regulation. This does not apply in the case of hair or similar parts of the human body which can be removed painlessly without anesthesia and which regenerate naturally; these can be left to someone else for a fee and are viewed as chattels.

(1) A person has the right to decide how his body will be disposed of after his death.

(2) Performing an autopsy or using a human body after a person's death for the needs of medical science, research or for teaching purposes without the consent of the deceased is only possible if another law provides.

(1) A person is entitled to decide what kind of funeral he should have. If he does not leave an explicit decision about it, the deceased's husband, and if there is no one, the deceased's children, will decide on his burial; if there are none, then the parents decide, and if there are none, the siblings of the deceased; if they are not alive, then their children decide, and if they are not there either, then any of the close people; if there is none of these persons, then the municipality in whose territory the person died decides.

(2) Burial costs and burial arrangements are covered by the estate. If the estate is not sufficient to cover the cost of the manner of burial the deceased desired, he must at least be buried in a decent manner according to local customs.

(3) Another legal regulation determines how and at whose expense a person will be buried whose estate is insufficient to cover the costs of the funeral and if no one is willing to cover the costs of the funeral voluntarily.

If a person dies without consenting to an autopsy or to the use of his body after death in accordance with Section 113, it is valid that he does not consent to the autopsy or such use of his body.

Whoever consents to having his body dissected or used in the manner according to § 113 after his death, shall enter his opinion in the register kept according to another legal regulation; this consent can also be expressed in a public document, or towards a provider of health services with effects towards this provider.

Consent to an autopsy or to the use of one's body after death for medical science, research, or educational purposes can be revoked. If a person in a healthcare facility revokes their consent, they can do so by means of a statement in writing.

(1) At least the date of its creation, the date of its dissolution with the indication of the legal reason and the date of its termination, as well as its name, registered office address and object of activity, the name and address of the residence or registered office of each member of the statutory body, together with an indication of the method, shall be entered in the public register , how this body represents the legal entity, and data on the date of creation or termination of their function.

(2) Another legal regulation determines what public registers of legal entities are, which legal entities are entered into them and how, or which other data about legal entities are entered into them, and how they are deleted from them, or whether a collection of documents is part of the public register. Public registers of legal entities are accessible to everyone; everyone can view them and take extracts, descriptions or copies from them.

(3) If the recorded fact changes, the registered person or the person who is required to do so by law shall notify the person who maintains the public register of the change without undue delay, and he shall enter this change in the public register without undue delay.

(1) The person to whom the entry relates does not have the right to object that the entry does not correspond to reality against a person who legally acts by trusting the data entered in the public register.

(2) If the information entered in the public register has been published, no one can claim after fifteen days from the publication that they could not have known about the published information. If the published data does not correspond to the recorded data, the person to whom the data relates cannot invoke the published data against another person; however, if she proves that she was aware of the information entered, she can object to it that the published information does not correspond to the information entered.

A legal entity can be established by a founding legal act, a law, a decision of a public authority, or in another way provided for by another legal regulation.

(1) The founding legal proceedings shall determine at least the name, registered office of the legal entity, object of activity, the legal entity's statutory body and how it is created, if the law does not directly stipulate this. It will also determine who the first members of the statutory body are.

(2) A written form is required for founding legal proceedings.

If it is not stated for what time the legal entity is established, it is valid that it is established for an indefinite period.

(1) Multiple founders establish a legal entity by adopting articles of association or concluding another contract.

(2) The law determines in which cases a legal entity can be established even by the legal actions of one person contained in the founding document.

(1) A legal entity is created on the day of registration in the public register.

(2) If a legal entity is established by law, it is created on the date of its entry into force, unless the law specifies a later date.

(3) The law determines in which other cases an entry in the public register is not required for the creation of a legal entity. The law specifies in which cases a decision of a public authority is required to establish or create a legal entity.

It is possible to act on behalf of a legal entity even before its establishment. Whoever acts in this way is entitled and bound by this action alone; if several persons act, they are jointly and severally authorized and bound. A legal entity can assume the effects of these actions for itself within three months of its creation. In such a case, she is entitled and bound by these negotiations from the beginning. If she takes them over, she will let other participants know that she has done so.

After the creation of a legal entity, it is not possible to request a determination that it has not been created, and its registration in the public register cannot be canceled for that reason.

(2) On the day a legal entity is declared invalid, it enters into liquidation.

Before making a decision pursuant to Section 129, the court shall grant the legal entity a reasonable period of time to remedy the defect, if it is a defect that can be removed.

The declaration of a legal entity as invalid does not affect the rights and obligations it has acquired.

(1) The name of the legal entity is its name.

(2) The name must distinguish a legal entity from another entity and contain an indication of its legal form. The name must not be misleading.

(1) The name may contain the name of a person to whom the legal entity has a special relationship. If a person is alive, his name can be used in the name of a legal entity only with his consent; if he died without consent, the consent of his husband is required, and if he is not, the consent of an adult descendant, and if he is not, the consent of an ancestor.

(2) If a surname was used in the name of the legal entity and if the reason for this is an important interest in the protection of the family, § 78 paragraph 3 shall be applied mutatis mutandis.

(3) Whoever has the right to grant consent to the use of a person's name in the name of a legal entity has the right to revoke it at any time, even if he has granted it for a certain period of time; if something else was agreed, it is not taken into account if the withdrawal of consent is justified by a substantial change in circumstances or another reasonable reason. If the consent granted for a certain period of time was revoked without a substantial change in circumstances or another reasonable reason, the appellant shall compensate the legal entity for the resulting damage.

(1) The name of a legal entity may contain some characteristic element of the name of another legal entity, if there is a reason for this in their mutual relationship. Even in that case, the public must be able to distinguish the two names sufficiently.

(2) The characteristic element of the name of another legal entity cannot be used in the name without its consent. The provision of Section 133, paragraph 3, shall be applied mutatis mutandis.

(1) A legal entity that has been affected by the questioning of its right to a name or that has suffered damage due to an unauthorized interference with this right, or that is threatened with such damage, in particular by unauthorized use of the name, may demand that the unauthorized interference be waived or that its consequences be removed.

(2) The same protection belongs to a legal entity against anyone who interferes with its reputation or privacy without lawful reason, unless it is for scientific or artistic purposes or press, radio, television or similar news; however, even such an intervention must not conflict with the legitimate interests of the legal entity.

(1) When establishing a legal entity, its seat is determined. If it does not disturb the peace and order in the house, the residence can also be in the apartment.

(2) If a legal entity is registered in the public register, it is sufficient if the founding legal act states the name of the municipality where the legal entity is located; however, the legal entity proposes to enter the full address of the registered office in the public register.

(1) Anyone can claim the real seat of a legal entity.

(2) A legal entity cannot object to the person who invokes the seat registered in the public register that he has a real seat in another place.

(1) A legal entity that has its registered office abroad can relocate its registered office to the territory of the Czech Republic. This does not apply if it is not permitted by the legal order of the state in which the legal entity has its seat, or if it concerns a legal entity prohibited under Section 145.

(2) A legal entity that intends to relocate its headquarters to the territory of the Czech Republic shall attach to the application for registration in the relevant public register a decision on the legal form of the Czech legal entity it has chosen, and the founding legal proceedings required by the Czech legal code for this form of legal entity.

(3) The internal legal relations of a legal entity are governed by the Czech legal system after the relocation of the registered office to the Czech Republic. Czech law also governs the liability of its members or members of its bodies for the debts of the legal entity, if they arose after the effective date of the relocation of the registered office to the country.

A legal entity that has its registered office in the Czech Republic may relocate its registered office abroad, if this does not contradict public order and if it is permitted by the legal order of the state to which the registered office of the legal entity is to be relocated.

(1) A legal entity that intends to relocate its headquarters abroad shall publish this intention, indicating the address of the new headquarters and the legal form after the relocation of the headquarters, at least three months before the date of the anticipated relocation of the headquarters. Creditors have the right to demand sufficient security for their still outstanding claims within two months of publication, if the collectability of their claims in the Czech Republic deteriorates after the relocation of the registered office.

(2) If there is no agreement on the method and extent of collateral, the court will decide on sufficient collateral and its extent, taking into account the type and amount of the claim. If the legal entity does not provide security according to the court's decision, the members of the statutory body are liable for the debts that were not secured, except for those who prove that they have made sufficient efforts to fulfill the decision.

(1) A member of a legal entity who did not agree to the relocation of the registered office abroad has the right to terminate the membership of the legal entity with effects as of the date of the relocation of the registered office. If a member of a legal entity has a right to settlement upon termination of membership, the legal entity shall provide him with settlement no later than the effective date of the relocation of the registered office. The members of the statutory body are responsible for the fulfillment of this obligation.

(2) Members of the legal entity and its statutory body are liable for debts incurred before the effective date of the relocation of the registered office, just as they were before the relocation of the registered office abroad.

The relocation of the seat is effective from the date of entry of its address in the relevant public register.

Sections 138 to 142 apply mutatis mutandis to the establishment and relocation of branches of legal entities.

(1) A legal entity can be established in public or private interest. Its nature is assessed according to the main activity of the legal entity.

(2) The law determines for which purposes a legal entity can be established only if special conditions are met.

(2) It is prohibited to establish a legal entity armed or with armed components, unless it is a legal entity established by law, which is expressly permitted or imposed by law to be armed or the creation of an armed component, or a legal entity that handles weapons in connection with its business according to another legal regulation , or a legal entity whose members hold or use weapons for sporting or cultural purposes or for hunting or to fulfill tasks according to another legal regulation.

Public benefit is a legal entity whose mission is to contribute to the achievement of the general welfare through its own activities in accordance with the founding legal act, if only persons of integrity have a significant influence on the decisions of the legal entity, if it has acquired property from honest sources and if it economically uses its wealth for public benefit purpose.

A public benefit legal entity has the right to enter the status of public benefit in the public register if it fulfills the conditions set by another legal regulation.

If the status of public benefit is entered in the public register, the person who keeps the public register deletes it, if the legal entity renounces the status of public benefit, or if the court decides to revoke it. By deletion from the public register, the status of public benefit ceases.

The court decides on the revocation of the status of public benefit upon the proposal of a person who has a legal interest in it, or even without a proposal in the event that the legal entity ceases to meet the conditions for its acquisition and does not remedy the deficiency within a reasonable period of time even upon the request of the court.

Only a legal entity whose status of public benefit is entered in the public register has the right to state in its name that it is a public benefit.

(1) The law determines, or the founding legal proceedings determine, in what manner and to what extent the members of the bodies of the legal entity make decisions on its behalf and replace its will.

(2) The good faith of the members of the body of the legal entity is attributed to the legal entity.

(1) A legal entity forms bodies with one member (individual) or several members (collective).

(2) A natural person who is a member of a body of a legal entity and who is elected, appointed or otherwise called to office (hereinafter referred to as "member of the elected body") must be fully independent. This also applies to a representative of a legal entity that is itself a member of the elected body of another legal entity.

(3) If the main activity of the legal entity concerns minors or persons with limited autonomy and if the main purpose of the legal entity is not business, the founding legal proceedings may determine that a member of the elected collective body of the legal entity may also be a minor or a person with limited autonomy.

(1) A person whose bankruptcy has been certified may become a member of an elected body if he has notified the person who calls him to the position in advance; this does not apply if at least three years have passed since the end of the insolvency proceedings.

(2) If the bankruptcy of a person who is a member of an elected body has been certified, this person shall notify the person who appointed him or her without undue delay.

(3) If there was no notification, anyone who has a legal interest in it can demand that the member of the elected body be removed from office by the court. This does not apply if the person who appointed the member of the elected body decided, after learning about the bankruptcy certificate of this person, that he should remain in office.

If the member of the elected body of the legal entity is another legal entity, it authorizes a natural person to represent it in the body, otherwise the legal entity is represented by a member of its statutory body.

(1) If a member of an elected body has been appointed who is not qualified to do so according to the law, his appointment to the position is viewed as if it had not happened. If a member of an elected body loses the legal capacity to be a member of an elected body after being called to office, his office ceases; shall notify the legal entity of the termination of the function without undue delay.

(2) If the appointment of a person to the position of a member of an elected body is regarded as if it had not happened, or if the appointment is invalid, this does not affect the right acquired in good faith.

(1) If the body is collective, it decides on the affairs of the legal entity in the congregation. It is able to resolve in the presence or other participation of the majority of members and makes decisions by the majority of the votes of the participating members.

(2) If the authority of individual members of the body is divided according to certain fields, the provisions of paragraph 1 shall not apply. The division of powers does not absolve the other members of the duty to supervise how the affairs of the legal entity are managed.

(1) If the decision is adopted, at the request of the member of the elected body who opposed the proposal, his dissenting opinion is recorded.

(2) If the proposal was accepted in the absence of one of the members, this member is entitled to learn the content of the decision.

(1) The founding legal meeting can establish a higher number of participants for the body's ability to reach a resolution, require a higher number of votes for the adoption of a decision, or establish a procedure by which the body's decision-making method can be changed.

(2) Founding legal proceedings may allow the body to make decisions outside of the meeting in written form or with the use of technical means.

(3) The founding legal proceedings may specify that in the event of equality of votes in the decision-making of the elected body of the legal entity, the vote of the chairman shall be decisive.

(1) Whoever accepts the position of a member of an elected body undertakes to perform it with the necessary loyalty and with the necessary knowledge and diligence. It is considered that he is acting negligently if he is not capable of this care of a proper householder, even if he had to find out when accepting the position or during its performance, and does not draw the consequences for himself.

(2) A member of an elected body performs the function in person; however, this does not prevent a member from authorizing another member of the same body to vote for him in his absence.

(3) If a member of the elected body did not compensate the legal entity for the damage caused to it by breach of duty while performing the function, although he was obliged to compensate the damage, he is liable to the creditor of the legal entity for its debt to the extent to which he did not compensate the damage, if the creditor cannot obtain performance from the legal entity.

If a member of an elected body resigns from his position by means of a statement sent to a legal entity, the position ceases after two months from the date of the statement.

Whoever represents the legal entity shall make it clear what authorizes him to do so, if it does not already follow from the circumstances. Whoever signs on behalf of a legal entity shall attach his signature to its name, as well as information about his function or job title.

If a legal entity is represented by a member of its body in a manner entered in the public register, it cannot be argued that the legal entity did not adopt the necessary resolution, that the resolution was flawed, or that a member of the body violated the adopted resolution.

The statutory body has all powers that are not entrusted to another body of a legal entity by the founding legal proceedings, the law or the decision of a public authority.

(1) A member of the statutory body may represent a legal entity in all matters.

(2) If the competence of the statutory body belongs to several persons, they form a collective statutory body. If the founding legal proceedings do not determine how its members represent the legal entity, each member does so independently. If the founding legal act requires the members of the statutory body to act together, the member can represent the legal entity as an agent separately, only if he has been authorized to perform a certain legal action.

(3) If a legal entity with a collective statutory body has employees, it shall entrust one member of the statutory body with legal actions towards employees; otherwise, this authority is exercised by the chairman of the statutory body.

(1) If the statutory body does not have a sufficient number of members required for decision-making, the court appoints the missing members on the proposal of the person who certifies the legal interest for the period until new members are called according to the procedure determined in the founding legal proceedings; otherwise, the court appoints a guardian for the legal entity, even without a proposal, whenever it learns about it in the course of its activities.

(2) The court appoints a guardian for a legal entity, even without a proposal, if the interests of a member of the statutory body conflict with the interests of the legal entity and if the legal entity does not have another member of the body capable of representing it.

(1) The legal entity is represented by its employees to the usual extent due to their classification or function; at the same time, the state of how it appears to the public is decisive. What is stipulated about the representation of a legal entity by an employee applies similarly to the representation of a legal entity by its member or by a member of another body not registered in the public register.

(2) The limitation of the representative authority by the internal regulation of the legal entity has effects towards a third party only if it had to be known to him.

A legal entity is bound by an illegal act committed by a member of an elected body, an employee or another of its representatives towards a third party in the performance of its duties.

(1) A legal entity is dissolved by legal action, expiration of time, decision of a public authority or achievement of the purpose for which it was established, and for other reasons established by law.

(2) Voluntary dissolution of a legal entity is decided by its competent authority.

(1) After the dissolution of a legal entity, its liquidation is required, unless all of its assets are acquired by a legal successor, or if the law provides otherwise.

(2) If it does not follow from the legal proceedings on the dissolution of a legal entity, whether it is dissolved with liquidation or without liquidation, it is valid that it is dissolved with liquidation.

Whoever decided on the dissolution of a legal entity with liquidation can change the decision until the purpose of the liquidation has been fulfilled.

(2) If the law allows the court to dissolve a legal entity for a reason that can be removed, the court shall set a reasonable period for it to eliminate the deficiencies before issuing a decision.

(1) If the legal entity is dissolved during the transformation, it is dissolved without liquidation on the effective date of the transformation.

(2) If the bankruptcy of a legal entity has been certified, it is canceled without liquidation by canceling the bankruptcy after meeting the schedule resolution, or by canceling the bankruptcy because the assets are completely insufficient; however, it will enter into liquidation if any property appears after the end of the insolvency proceedings.

(1) Transformation of a legal entity is a merger, division and change of legal form.

(2) A legal entity can change its legal form only if the law provides for it.

(1) Whoever decided on the transformation of a legal entity can change the decision until the transformation becomes effective.

(2) If the transformation of a legal entity becomes effective, it cannot be decided that it did not occur, nor can the legal action that led to the transformation be declared invalid, and the registration of the transformation in the public register cannot be cancelled.

(1) During the conversion, a decisive date must be determined from which the actions of the terminating legal entity are considered from an accounting point of view as actions carried out on behalf of the successor legal entity.

(2) As of the day preceding the decisive day, the liquidating legal entity or the legal entity divided by spin-off shall draw up the final financial statements. On the decisive date, the successor legal entity or the legal entity divided by spin-off shall draw up an opening balance sheet.

(1) The effectiveness of the transformation of a legal entity entered in the public register occurs on the date of entry into the public register. In such a case, the decisive date is set so that it does not precede the date of submission of the proposal for registration of the conversion in the public register by more than twelve months.

(2) If the persons involved are registered in the public register in different districts, a proposal to register the conversion is submitted in any of them and the public authority will enter all recorded facts in the public register on the same day.

(1) A merger takes place by merging or merging at least two participating legal entities. A merger or amalgamation is considered a transfer of the employer's business.

(2) In a merger, at least one of the parties involved ceases to exist; the rights and obligations of the terminating persons are transferred to only one of the participating persons as a successor legal entity.

(3) In the event of a merger, all participating persons cease to exist and a new legal entity is created in their place as a successor entity; the rights and obligations of all disappearing persons are transferred to it.

(1) A legal entity with a split is divided with the establishment of new legal entities, or it is divided during a simultaneous merger with other legal entities (hereinafter referred to as "division by merger"). A legal entity can also be established by splitting off or by combining several methods of division. Division by merger, spin-off, as well as other methods of division, are considered to be the transfer of the employer's business.

(3) When a legal entity is divided by spin-off, the divided legal entity is not canceled or terminated, but the separated part of its rights and obligations is transferred to an existing or newly established successor entity.

In the cases referred to in Section 179, paragraph 2 or 3, the competent authority of the legal entity shall decide which employees of the terminating legal entity will become employees of individual successor legal entities.

Legal entities with different legal forms may merge and divide only if the law so provides.

If, through the transformation of a legal entity, its property is transferred to a successor legal entity, and if, according to another legal regulation, the consent of a public authority is required for the transfer of rights and obligations, this consent is also required for the transformation of a legal entity.

(1) When the legal form is changed, the legal entity whose legal form is changed is not canceled or terminated, only its legal conditions change, and in the case of a corporation, also the legal status of its members.

(2) If the day on which the draft contract or the decision to change the legal form was drawn up is not a balance sheet date according to another legal regulation, the legal entity shall draw up an interim financial statement for that day. The data from which the financial statements are compiled as of the date of processing the change of legal form must not precede the date of the legal entity's decision on the change of legal form by more than three months.

(1) A decision can be made on the transformation of a legal entity established by law if the law expressly provides for it.

(2) The conversion of a legal entity established by a decision of a public authority is decided by this authority.

A legal entity registered in the public register ceases to exist on the day of deletion from the public register.

A legal entity that is not subject to registration in the public register ceases to exist upon completion of liquidation.

(1) The purpose of the liquidation is to settle the assets of the dissolved legal entity (liquidation essence), settle debts to creditors and dispose of the net asset balance resulting from the liquidation (with the liquidation balance), according to the law.

(2) A legal entity enters liquidation on the day it is dissolved or declared invalid. If a legal entity registered in the public register goes into liquidation, the liquidator shall propose entry into liquidation in the public register without undue delay. During liquidation, the legal entity uses its name with the addition "in liquidation".

If a legal entity goes into liquidation, no one may legally act on its behalf beyond the scope set out in § 196 from the moment when he learned about its entry into liquidation or when he should and could have learned about it.

(1) Upon entry into liquidation, the competent authority shall appoint a liquidator to the legal entity; only a person qualified to be a member of the statutory body can be a liquidator. If the function of the liquidator ceases before the dissolution of the legal entity, the competent authority of the legal entity shall appoint a new liquidator without undue delay.

(2) If the legal entity is in liquidation and if the liquidator has not been called, all members of the statutory body exercise his powers.

If several liquidators are called to liquidate a legal entity, they form a collective body.

(1) A liquidator is appointed by the court, even without a proposal, for a legal entity that entered into liquidation without a liquidator being called in accordance with Section 189. The court appoints a liquidator even if it itself decided to dissolve the legal entity.

(2) At the proposal of a person who certifies a legal interest in this, the court dismisses a liquidator who does not properly fulfill his duties and appoints a new liquidator.

(3) If no other proposal has been submitted or if the proposal cannot be granted, the court can appoint a member of the statutory body as a liquidator in the procedure according to paragraph 1 or 2 even without his consent. Such a liquidator cannot resign from his position. However, he may propose to the court to relieve him of his position if he proves that he cannot be fairly required to perform the position.

(4) If the liquidator cannot be appointed even according to paragraph 3, the court appoints him from among the persons entered in the list of insolvency administrators.

If the liquidator was appointed by the court, third parties shall provide cooperation to the liquidator to the same extent as they are obliged to provide it to the insolvency administrator.

The liquidator acquires the powers of a statutory body at the moment of his appointment. The liquidator is equally responsible for the proper performance of his duties as a member of the statutory body.

Only the court can dismiss the liquidator who was appointed to the position.

The liquidator's remuneration and the method of its payment are determined by the person who called him.

(1) The activity of the liquidator can only pursue a purpose that corresponds to the nature and goal of the liquidation.

(2) If a legal person has acquired an inheritance or a legacy with a condition, a time commitment or an order, the liquidator will observe these restrictions. However, if the legal entity received earmarked funds from public budgets, the liquidator will use these funds according to the decision of the authority that provided them; the liquidator proceeds similarly if the legal entity received funds earmarked for the achievement of a publicly beneficial purpose.

During the liquidation, the liquidator will preferentially satisfy the claims of the employees; this does not apply if the legal entity is bankrupt.

(1) The liquidator shall notify all known creditors of the entry of the legal entity into liquidation.

(2) The liquidator shall, without undue delay, publish at least twice in a row, at least two weeks apart, the notification according to paragraph 1, together with a call for creditors to register their claims within a period that must not be shorter than three months from the second publication.

(1) The liquidator shall draw up the opening balance sheet and inventory of the legal entity's assets on the date of entry of the legal entity into liquidation.

(2) The liquidator will issue an inventory of assets against payment of costs to any creditor who requests it.

If the liquidator discovers during the liquidation that the legal entity is bankrupt, he shall file an insolvency petition without undue delay, unless it is a case referred to in § 201.

(1) If it is a case according to Section 173, paragraph 2, and the liquidation proceeds are not sufficient to satisfy all debts, the liquidator will pay the costs of the liquidation from the proceeds in the first group, satisfy the employees' claims from the balance in the second group, and then pay the claims of other creditors in the third group.

(2) If it is not possible to fully settle claims in the same group, they will be satisfied proportionately.

(1) If it is not possible to monetize the entire liquidation asset within a reasonable time, the liquidator will settle the costs and claims from the first and then from the second group, if possible, from the partial proceeds; this does not affect § 201, paragraph 2. The liquidator then offers the creditors of the claims of the third group the liquidation substance to take over for the payment of debts.

(2) If it is not possible to monetize even a part of the liquidation property within a reasonable time, or if the claims of the first and second groups are not completely settled from the partial proceeds, the liquidator will offer the liquidation property to be taken over by all creditors.

(3) A creditor who has been offered liquidation assets pursuant to paragraph 1 or 2 and has not responded to the offer within two months is deemed to have accepted the offer; this effect will not occur if the liquidator has not instructed him in the offer.

(1) Creditors who take over the liquidation assets are each entitled to a share determined by the ratio of the amount of their claims; in the rest, their claims are extinguished.

(2) If any of the creditors refuses to participate in taking over the liquidation assets, their claim is considered extinguished. This does not apply if previously unknown assets of the legal entity are subsequently discovered.

(1) If all creditors refuse to take over the liquidation substance, the liquidation substance passes to the state on the day of the dissolution of the legal entity; the liquidator shall notify the competent authority under another law without undue delay.

(2) Without regard to Sections 201 to 203, a creditor who is a secured creditor under another law is entitled to satisfaction from the security with which his claim was secured. If the secured creditor is not fully satisfied in his claim in this way, he is entitled to the rest of the performance according to Sections 201 to 203.

(1) As soon as the liquidator has completed everything that precedes the handling of the liquidation balance or the transfer of the liquidation assets pursuant to § 202 or the notification pursuant to § 204, he shall draw up a final report on the progress of the liquidation, in which he shall state at least how the liquidation assets were disposed of and, where applicable, also a proposal for the use of the liquidation balance. On the same day, the liquidator will draw up the financial statements. The liquidator attaches a signature record to the financial statements.

(2) The final report, the proposal for the use of the liquidation balance and the financial statements are submitted by the liquidator for approval to the person who appointed him to the position. A person who has become a liquidator pursuant to Section 189, paragraph 1, shall submit a final report, a proposal for the use of the liquidation balance and financial statements to the authority of the legal entity that has the power to remove him from office, or the power to control him. If there is no such authority, the liquidator shall submit these documents and proposals for approval by the court.

(3) The deletion of a legal entity from the public register is not prevented by the fact that the documents referred to in paragraph 1 have not been approved.

(1) As long as the rights of all creditors who have filed their claims in time pursuant to Section 198 are not satisfied, a share of the liquidation balance cannot be paid out either in the form of an advance payment or used in any other way.

(2) If the claim is disputed or not yet due, the liquidation balance can only be used if sufficient security has been provided to the creditor.

The liquidation ends with the use of the liquidation balance, the taking over of the liquidation substance by the creditor, or its rejection. The liquidator submits a proposal for deletion of the legal entity from the public register within thirty days from the end of the liquidation.

If, even before the deletion of a legal entity from the public register, its previously unknown property is discovered or if the need for other necessary measures appears, the liquidation will not end and the liquidator will settle this property or carry out other necessary measures. After the end of these negotiations, he proceeds according to Sections 205 to 207; the provisions of § 170 do not apply.

(1) If unknown assets of a legal entity are discovered after its deletion from the public register or if another interest worthy of legal protection appears, the court, on the proposal of the person who certifies the legal interest, cancels the deletion of the legal entity, decides on its liquidation and appoints a liquidator. According to this decision, whoever keeps the public register shall enter in it the restoration of the legal entity, the fact that it is in liquidation and information about the liquidator. Since the restoration, the legal entity has been viewed as if it had never ceased to exist.

(2) If the legal entity was restored due to the discovery of unknown assets, the unsatisfied claims of its creditors will be restored.

(1) A corporation is created as a legal entity by a community of persons.

(2) A legal entity formed by a single member is viewed as a corporation.

(1) A corporation may have a single member if permitted by law. In such a case, a single member of the corporation cannot voluntarily terminate his membership unless a new person takes his place as a result.

(2) If the number of members of the corporation falls below the number established by law, the court will cancel it even without a motion and decide on its liquidation. First, however, he will give her a reasonable period of time to remedy the situation.

(1) By accepting membership in the corporation, the member undertakes to behave honestly towards it and to preserve its internal order. The corporation must not unreasonably favor or disadvantage its member and must protect his membership rights and legitimate interests.

(2) If a member of a private corporation abuses the right to vote to the detriment of the whole, the court will decide, on the proposal of the person who proves a legal interest, that the vote of this member cannot be taken into account for a certain case. This right expires if the motion is not filed within three months from the day the abuse of voice occurred.

If a member of the corporation or a member of its body damages the corporation in a way that establishes his obligation to compensate and by which another member of the corporation was also damaged in terms of the value of his participation, and if only this member claims compensation, the court may impose an obligation on the damage party even without a special proposal compensate the caused damage only to the corporation if the circumstances of the case justify it, especially if it is sufficiently obvious that such a measure will also compensate for the damage to the devalued participation.

(1) At least three persons guided by a common interest can establish an association to fulfill it as a self-governing and voluntary union of members and join together in it.

(2) If the associations create a new association as their association to pursue a common interest, they shall express its associational nature in the name of the new association.

(1) No one may be forced to participate in the association and no one may be prevented from leaving it.

(2) Members of the association are not liable for his debts.

The name of the association must contain the words "association" or "registered association", but the abbreviation "zs" will suffice.

(1) The main activity of the association can only be the satisfaction and protection of those interests for the fulfillment of which the association was founded. Entrepreneurship or other gainful activity cannot be the main activity of the association.

(2) In addition to the main activity, the association may also develop a secondary economic activity consisting of business or other income-generating activity, if its purpose is to support the main activity or the economic use of the association's property.

(3) The profit from the association's activities can only be used for the association's activities, including the administration of the association.

A foundation is a legal entity created by assets earmarked for a specific purpose. Its activity is tied to the purpose for which it was established.

The foundation is established by founding legal proceedings or by law, in which its property security and purpose must also be determined.

The foundation's internal conditions are governed by its statute.

(1) The founder establishes a foundation to permanently serve a socially or economically useful purpose. The purpose of the foundation can be public benefit, if it consists in supporting the general welfare, or charitable, if it consists in supporting a certain circle of persons determined individually or otherwise.

(2) It is prohibited to establish a foundation for the purpose of supporting political parties and movements or otherwise participating in their activities. It is prohibited to establish a foundation serving exclusively profit-making purposes. If the foundation fulfills a prohibited purpose, the court will cancel it even without a motion and order its liquidation.

(1) A foundation can run a business if the business is merely a secondary activity and the proceeds of the business serve only to support its purpose; however, the foundation may not do business if the founder has excluded it in the foundation charter. Under the same conditions, the foundation can take over the management of a commercial company.

(2) The foundation may not be an unlimited liability partner of a business company.

(1) The name of the foundation contains the word "foundation".

(2) A designation indicating its purpose is a regular part of the foundation's name.

(1) The founder establishes an endowment fund for a socially or economically useful purpose.

(2) The name of the endowment fund must contain the words "endowment fund".

An endowment fund is established by a deed of foundation or an acquisition in the event of death.

(2) If the endowment fund is established by acquisition in case of death and if the founder does not specify the method of appointing the first members of the administrative and supervisory board, or the first auditor, the executor of the will appoints them; otherwise, they are appointed by the court at the proposal of a person who certifies a legal interest in it.

The endowment fund is created on the day of registration in the public register.

(1) The endowment fund's assets consist of a collection created from deposits and donations, the object of which does not have to meet the assumption of permanent income. What is in the property of the endowment fund cannot be mortgaged or otherwise used to secure a debt; legal action that contradicts it is disregarded.

(2) The property of the endowment fund can be alienated if it is in accordance with the purpose of the endowment fund. It can also be used for an investment considered prudent.

(3) The endowment fund does not create endowment capital or endowment capital.

(1) If this is expressly permitted by the founding legal proceedings, the board of directors may decide, after a prior opinion of the supervisory board or the auditor, to change the legal form of the endowment fund to a foundation. The decision to change the legal form must contain at least the designation of the endowment fund with the name, seat and identifying information and the requirements specified for the endowment deed.

(2) The decision requires the form of a public document.

(1) At least thirty days before the meeting of the board of trustees, the endowment fund shall publish a notice of intention to change its legal form.

(2) A creditor of an endowment fund who registers his claim within six months from the date on which the registration of the change became effective against third parties may request the securing of his claim with sufficient security if the claimability of the claim deteriorates as a result of the change in legal form. If the creditor proves that, as a result of the change in legal form, the enforceability of his claim will deteriorate in a substantial way, he is entitled to sufficient security even before the change in legal form is registered in the public register.

(1) If it is not permanently possible for the endowment fund to continue to fulfill its purpose, the board of directors decides on the termination of the endowment fund with liquidation and elects a liquidator.

(2) If the endowment fund does not fulfill the purpose for which it was established, the court will cancel it at the proposal of a person who certifies a legal interest in it, and will order its liquidation.

a) the name of the institute and its headquarters,

b) the purpose of the institute by defining the subject of its activity, possibly also the subject of its business,

c) information on the amount of the deposit, or its non-monetary object,

d) the number of members of the board of directors as well as the names and residences of its first members a

e) details of the internal organization of the institute, if it is not reserved by the regulation of the statute of the institute.

(1) If the founder's legal proceedings do not specify another method, the founder appoints and dismisses the members of the board of directors. If this is not possible, the members of the board of directors are elected and dismissed by the supervisory board, if it has been established; otherwise, the board elects and dismisses its members itself.

(2) If the founding legal proceedings do not specify a different term of office for a member of the board of directors, it is three years. If this does not preclude founding legal proceedings, a member of the board of directors can be elected repeatedly; however, if the board elects and dismisses its members itself, the same person may be re-elected for a maximum of two consecutive terms.

(3) If a supervisory board has been established, membership in the board of directors and in the supervisory board is incompatible.

The board of directors elects and dismisses the director, supervises the performance of his powers and decides on the institute's legal proceedings against the director; unless otherwise specified, the chairman of the board of directors acts on behalf of the institute in these legal proceedings.

(1) The board of directors approves the budget, regular and extraordinary financial statements and the institute's annual report.

(2) The board of directors decides on the start of operation of a commercial plant or other secondary activity of the institute or on changing its subject, unless the founding legal proceedings stipulate otherwise.

(2) If the founding legal act does not specify otherwise, the board of directors also grants prior consent to a legal act by which the institute acquires or loses the ownership right to movable property, the value of which is higher than the value of a small-scale contract according to the law governing public contracts.

(1) If this is determined by the founding legal proceedings or if it is expedient, the board of directors issues the statute of the institute and regulates the internal organization of the institute and details of its activities.

(2) The institute publishes the statute by depositing it in the collection of documents. Anyone can consult the statute in the public register and obtain extracts, descriptions or copies from it. The same right can also be exercised at the headquarters of the institute.

If the charter does not specify that the members of the institute's bodies are entitled to remuneration for the performance of their functions and the method of determining it, the director is entitled to the usual remuneration and it is considered that the functions of the members of the other bodies are honorary. In such a case, the board of directors shall determine the amount of the director's remuneration or the method of its determination.

(1) The institute accounts separately for the costs and revenues associated with the main subject of activity, with the operation of a commercial plant or other secondary activity and with the administration of the institute.

(2) The financial statement of the institute is verified by the auditor if it is required by the founding legal act or the statute, or if the amount of the net turnover of the institute exceeds ten million CZK. In these cases, the auditor also verifies the institute's annual report.

(1) The institute's annual report contains, in addition to the requirements stipulated by other legal regulations governing accounting, other important data on the activity and management of the institute, including the amount of payments provided to the members of the institute's bodies, and any changes to the founding legal proceedings or changes to the membership of the institute's bodies.

(2) If the founding legal proceedings do not specify another method of publication, the institute shall publish the annual report no later than six months after the end of the accounting period by depositing it in a collection of documents. Anyone can consult the statute in the public register and obtain extracts, descriptions or copies from it.

If the institute does not fulfill its purpose in the long term, the court will cancel it at the proposal of a person who proves the legal interest.

In other cases, the provisions on the foundation shall be applied similarly to the legal conditions of the institute; however, the provisions on foundation principal and foundation capital do not apply.

(1) If a guardian is appointed, the guardian or any person close to the guardian may request the establishment of a guardianship council; the guardian calls a meeting of persons close to the ward and his friends, if they are known to him, so that the meeting takes place within thirty days of receiving the request. If the meeting is not convened in time or if it is not held for another reason, or if the guardianship council is not elected, the court will convene the meeting, even without a proposal.

(2) The guardian, any person close to the guardian and any of his friends may attend the meeting, even if he has not been invited; each of them has one vote. If at least five people attend the meeting, the guardian board can be elected.

(1) The persons present at the meeting elect the members of the guardianship council, or their substitutes, by a majority of votes. During the election, care must be taken, if possible, for equal representation of the persons listed in § 472.

(2) A member of the guardianship council can only be a person who proves a long-term and serious interest in the ward and the ability to show it in the future, and whose interests do not conflict with the interests of the ward. The guardian cannot be a member of the guardianship council.

The Guardian Council has at least three members. It is able to resolve in the presence of the majority of members; however, if the board of guardians has three members, the presence of all is required. Decisions are taken by the Guardian Council by a majority vote of the members present.

The minutes of the election of members of the guardianship council and substitutes will be drawn up by a recorder appointed by those present. It must be clear from the minutes when the meeting was held, who attended it, who was elected recorder, member of the guardianship board and substitute and how many votes, whether someone protested the course of the meeting and for what reason. Protests submitted in written form must be attached to the minutes. The recorder shall deliver the record of the election of members of the guardianship council to the guardian and the court that appointed the guardian.

(1) The court may, on the proposal of the guardian or any person authorized to participate in the meeting, or without a proposal, declare the election to be invalid, if there has been such a violation of the law that the guardian is in danger of being harmed as a result. In such a case, the court shall order a new election without undue delay.

(2) If there are serious reasons for this, the court may suspend the exercise of the rights of a member of the guardianship board after the initiation of proceedings until a decision is made on the invalidity of the election.

(1) A member of the guardianship board is elected for an indefinite period. He may resign from his position; withdrawal is effective upon delivery of written notice to the guardian and the court. He shall notify the other members of the guardianship council of his resignation.

(2) The court may remove a member of the guardianship board from office at the proposal of the guardian or any of the persons authorized to participate in the meeting, or on its own initiative, if the member of the guardianship board seriously or repeatedly violates his duties, if he loses interest in the ward or if his interests are repeatedly in conflict with the ward's interests. The provision of Section 476, paragraph 2, shall be applied mutatis mutandis.

(3) When a member of the guardianship council ceases to function, the guardian or chairman of the guardianship council arranges for the election of a new member of the guardianship council or a substitute. If the election does not take place without unnecessary delay, the court proceeds similarly according to § 472, paragraph 1.

(1) The Board of Trustees meets at least once a year; it is called to a meeting by its chairman, or by the guardian, otherwise by any member of the guardianship council, or by the court at the proposal of a person who certifies a serious interest in the ward, or even without a proposal.

(2) The guardianship council will invite both the ward and the guardian to the meeting.

(3) It must be clear from the minutes of the meeting of the guardianship council when it was held, who participated in it, what decisions were taken, who raised a protest and who took the minutes. If the minutes do not indicate who voted for the proposal and who against the proposal, it is assumed that all members of the guardianship board present voted for the adoption of the proposal. The minutes will be delivered by the chairman of the guardianship council to the guardian and the court that appointed the guardian.

(1) At its regular meeting, the guardianship council discusses the guardian's report on his activities in the ward's affairs, comments on the inventory of the ward's property and the account of its management, as well as the account of any remuneration of the guardian for the management of the property.

(2) If the guardianship council decides on this, its member authorized to do so by the resolution will submit a proposal to the court to change the amount of the guardian's remuneration for managing the ward's assets.

(3) If the guardianship council decides to do so, its authorized member will submit a proposal to the court to cancel the guardianship, or to remove the guardian and replace him with another person.

(3) If it is in the interest of the ward, the guardianship council can decide what further decisions of the guardian about the ward are subject to its approval; such resolutions may not restrict the guardian beyond what is reasonable under the circumstances.

A member of the guardianship council who did not vote for its decision, the guardian or ward may, within fifteen days of the adoption of the decision, propose to the court that the guardianship council's decision be annulled and replaced with its own decision. Until the court decides, the decision of the guardianship council will not have legal effects.

(1) If a guardianship council cannot be established due to the lack of interest of a sufficient number of persons listed in § 472 paragraph 1 or for other similar reasons, the court may, on the proposal of one of these persons, decide that the powers of the guardianship council will be exercised by only one of these persons and decide at the same time on its appointment.

(2) If the guardianship council is not elected and if the procedure according to paragraph 1 is not possible, the court approves the measures of the guardian of the ward's parties or his property instead of the guardianship council.

(1) If the court has not approved it, the guardian may not consent to a change in the ward's personal status.

(4) Before making a decision according to paragraphs 1 to 3, the court shall request the opinion of the guardianship council. If the guardianship council does not inform the court of its opinion within a reasonable period of time, then the court will decide on its own.

(1) A legal entity whose main activity consists in caring for persons with disabilities and protecting their interests has the right to propose that a meeting be convened to establish a guardianship board.

(2) A legal entity whose main activity consists in the care of persons with disabilities and the protection of their interests, which has been operating continuously in the Czech Republic for at least three years and has been in regular contact with the ward for at least three months, has the right to be a member of the guardianship council or to participate in its meeting , a meeting to establish a guardianship council and propose to the court to cancel the guardianship council's decision and replace it with its own decision. However, if this legal entity does not exercise its rights in accordance with the interests of the ward, the court will take away these rights at the proposal of the ward, guardian or members of the guardianship council.

(1) The guardian who manages the property of the ward shall draw up an inventory of the managed property within two months of his appointment and deliver it to the court, the ward and the guardianship council.

(2) During the duration of the guardianship, the guardian shall draw up an account of the management of the assets every year by June 30th, unless it is agreed with the members of the guardianship council that the account will be submitted earlier. If there is an important reason for this, the guardian or the guardianship council can propose to the court that the guardian be obliged to draw up an extraordinary account. The guardian shall deliver each bill to the ward, the guardianship board and the court.

(3) The guardian, whose position ends, delivers the final account of the administration of the property to the guardian, the guardianship council and the court, where applicable, also to the next guardian or court commissioner appointed in the probate proceedings. If the guardian dies, anyone who has these documents and documents with him shall issue to the court that appointed him documents and other documents relating to the ward and his affairs.